I see this as working, but at what cost?......and does that cost outweigh losses?
The way I see it, with porting and then triple exhausts, you do eliminate exhaust gases quicker and more completely. However, with a portion of the fresh intake charges being mixed with exhaust gases, much of the fresh intake charge would be lost in the extra volume of the triple exhaust ports.
Example(random #s):
-Conventional porting loses 8% of fresh intake charge as piston closes the exhaust port going towards TDC.
-Triple exhaust porting loses 12% of fresh intake charge as piston closes the exhaust port going towards TDC due to extra volume of triple exhaust port allowing more space for RETURNING fresh intake charge from pipe to remain.
I suppose that's my biggest question. Now if you could somehow add in valves similar to reed petals to open and close the triple ports(where they meet the main exhaust port), I could see it being even more beneficial.......however that's much easier said than done concerning the temps it would have to endure and judging by the amount of pressure/vacuum draw you would need. Another way you could maybe improve backflow slightly is to put a lip on the entrance of the triple exhaust ports into the main exhaust port so that it flows just as well during the exhaust phase, but when the intake charge is returned the air flow flows more over the lip to help direct it back through the main exhaust port and back into the cylinder.