Steve I think you just added to the rowdiness.Now you seem to be very knowledgable so tell me.Did you dyno or have any proof of 30hp with a redesigned head,airbox lid off and raised exhaist port? I would have to agree that the statement above is a little far fetched.In my opinion you will need a full port job,redesigned head,decent pipe of your choice to be in the 30hp range.Now comes the question of the stock carb.Just how much can the stock 26mm carb handle for power before it falls on it's face?Please explain your beliefs.Thanks
Dualstroke, you are right, I knew I would be stepping into the cow patty when posted that because it would offend some opinions, but if you read it carefully, I stand behind it as fact. First off, no, I did not dyno either engine. I owned and drove a (manufacturer claimed) 32hp DT200 for a lot of years. 85-90mph top speed. I also have a 42hp KTM 125 to compare to it as well as a ~50hp KTM 300 and a 45~48hp KTM 250 in my Blaster. Sketcky way to compare HP I'll agree, but my son (Triplecrown) has put one of those stock DT200 32hp engines in his Blaster so we have a darned good idea of what 32hp feels like and what it can do. With the KTM 250 in mine I have a good idea what 45~48hp feels like.
You can look back through my posts (some links below) to see we thoroughly investigated the differences between the 32hp DT200 and the 17hp Blaster. Hemi head chamber and exhaust port height are it. Even the stock Blaster/DT pipe differences are small. Not contend with theory alone, Neil and I put it to the test and successfully made a Blaster engine that rivalled the DT200 with only the head and raised port mods, even with a stock Blaster pipe (aftermarket still recommended!). With careful attention to squish this engine hauled even harder. Aftermarket pipe, some intake porting, more compression all added a hp or two here and there, but it was the head that made the largest gain, that put it up into the 30hp region.
Not just any modified head will put you into this hp range. JoeAK47 and I and I am sure KOC have done experimenting, one item at a time to figure what makes the power. Look over Joe and my past posts, we have been completely open with what we have found and posted pictures. I have one of Joes's engines here and it is a hauler! Snow and cold weather (jetting issues) have prevented full power tests and comparisons, but this engine really hauls butt. It is an example of simple attention to detail. Excellent cylinder head, conservative port timing and porting, nothing wild except the power output from idle to scream.
Pipe? It helps for sure but even the stock pipe will get you to the 30hp range if the head is right.
Carb? We have played with 28, 32, 35 and 38mm carbs. Not a limit at this stage.
Full port job? Moderate (but worthwhile!) gain over the port raise and rechamber. Big potential for loss if you get it wrong or over-do it.
All this stuff helps (if done right) but the largest gain is the head and port raise.
Oh yes, and like the porting, the head mod can be screwed up too. Wrong shape or squish or volume will not help.
Man ! Where did you come up with this ??? I have a redesigned head along with many other mods. Going by what your saying, I should be pushing 60 HP .lol. I just can't beleave your posting this false info. I CALL BS !!!
HP does not work this way. You cannot make a list and add it up:
Stock Blaster = 17hp
Head mod = 15hp
+4 key = 2hp
raised port = 5hp
pipe = 3hp
lid off = 2hp
iridium plug = 1hp
K&N filter = 2hp
Boyesens = 2hp
Triple exhausts = 2hp
240 displacement = +20%
total = 60hp? DOES NOT WORK THIS WAY!
Any of these figures may be true on its own but they do not compile.
Don't have the balls to call me out on this forum inbread ? You have to go over to The other forum to do it ? I don't beleave the power claim but if he can prove me wrong, ill give him max rep.
What is it that you are wrong about anyway? Who is calling you out? Me?
What other forum? Is an "inbread" a guy with too much money?
Personal attacks are a sure sign of an emotional resort to running out of ammo in a logical arguement.
Personal attacks say bad things about one's character and should be avoided.
In matters of "belief" most folks don't ever accept opposing logic, unless they are very emotionally secure and open minded.
Have I walked too boldly in the pasture again?
Please lighten up and use this as a place to share information.
Odds are good you'd like me if you met me.
Steve