Wanting an opinion from the big dogs to see if I should break in my rings with 20:1 or the normal 35:1? Thanks Blaster bro's.B)
Miss type. I ment 32:1. Lol.
Miss type. I ment 32:1. Lol.
Last edited:
40:1 is very lean!!!
You can break in whatever ratio you want, assuming you have your machine jetted for that ratio and the ratio can handle the oiling needs of the engine.
20:1 in theory provides MORE lubrication, which in theory will make your rings and parts not seat in as quickly.
I myself will be breaking my top end in soon and I have no intention of changing my mix ratio for the breakin. 32:1 it will be.
And edit for Slick, youre right Slick. The terms Rich and Lean get tossed around with gas/oil ratios and its not really correct. The more gasoline is in your mixture, technically, the RICHER your machine is going to run. The more oil you have in there, the less space for gasoline to take up, and the LEANER it will run.
i think the confusion comes in with the 2 types of rich/leaness i like to think of it as two seperate entities, your fuel/oil ratio and then once that is set, your fuel/air ratio. what you are talking about Luni is the latter. less oil in your gas makes your fuel/oil ration LEANER but overall it makes your fuel/air ratio RICHER as the fuel is less vicous and can be atomised better with the air and pass thru jets easier.
correct me if im wrong, but wouldnt running to much oil cause the rings to not seat properly
http://www.blasterforum.com/engine-13/pre-mix-ratios-myth-facts-read-14935/
Wondered when someone would mention that thread. In the factory owners manual for a Banshee (1987 model) they recomend 20:1 for break-in, 24:1 after. My 250 Elsinore runs 20:1. Considering plugs and oil are easier and cheaper than pistons and cranks, I'll continue to run 28:1 thank you. I love the smell of bean oil I:I
BTW, how many of you have ACTUALLY read all of that thread???:-/
I just did.lol..............