any 250 motocross motor could be made to fit, and my old man (BEST) has the cleanest setup iv seen using his ktm300. a blaster motor with mild work done to it can make for a sweet rig, lightweight and peppy. if that wr200 for a 1000 bucks is from the mid to late 1980's then id consider it. these motors are the same as dt200 motor there a pretty sweet setup, i run one atm in my bike and with a good pipe and goods these sound very similer to the motocross engines. i can keep up with the old man all day, altho drag racing side to side u can really notice his extra 100cc's
"Keep up with the old man all day" Ha! Just 'cuz I let ya!
If I opened her up for anything more than just a few seconds, I'd be all alone in the woods!
(stand back for a Canadian hockey style family knock down. Careful where you place your odds, he is taller, but I bite!)
Seriously, it is a 250 not a 300, only 50cc larger. And Neil's riding skill do tend to keep him snapping at my heels. I considered a 300 or 380 engine in my Blaster but it turns out the primary gear ratios are worse than the 250, which is still very high. I am running 12/44 to get 65-70mph. Even at that, my transmission ratios are so close that first is tall to start away in mud or dicey situations.
The almost 50hp motocross engine is tuned for peak power. I cheated a bit, adding some to the pipe length to bring the power band lower. It still has less torque than a stock Blaster on initial off idle clutch release. This motor is about 6 lbs lighter than the Blaster engine, which helps to make up for the extra weight of the radiator and coolant.
It is hard to beat the stock Blaster motor. Good gear ratios, good design, cheap parts and a well stocked aftermarket. Unless you have the design and metalworking skills to make pipes and weld on chrome-moly, I'd stick with the Blaster and mod it up with a new head, tight squish, light port.