if i remember right, KOR did do a cylinder where he removed the bridge. i believe it ran fine.
It's not as simple as that trust me.
never said it was. just bringing up the fact that a blaster cylinder has been ran without the bridge.
as are the CT/LA. Sleeve cylinders
imagin if your ported a ct, like made the 2 bridges or whatever pointy
I'm wondering if he is parting it because he could never could get it to run properly after it's rebuild?
Look at the intake bridge in the ebay 265 kit..>> Blaster 265cc 75mm Big Bore Kit Sleeve Piston Triple Port Cylinder Head Wossner | eBay The only part left is the sleeve part! I like it!
I saw an old Kawasaki street bike with race porting that had a "widows peak" sticking down where the bridge used to be. It was just enough to keep the ring in the piston. Here is the best picture I could find to illustrate what I'm talking about: https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/...k1_2ZpNReZyLKpxRbhwX_P6ueb7yv-iREpZKdooDZFlT6
Even though this Blaster jug looks it was done by a third grader I am tempted to buy it for $50 and see how it runs.
Good posibilitiy right there. Probably butched the ex even worse. Wouldn't run even with a drag pipe,lol. Maybe pistons were failing? Isn't 68mm the last bore?
I've been looking for a picture of that Kawi cylinder but I can't find it anywhere, it still seems crazy to me that you you can look in the engine and see so much of the rings at bdc. I did stumble across an interesting read for you guys that like technical stuff though: Klemm Vintage Modifications for