so shouldint i start rich first like at a 290 and im not sure if i was lean b4 or not the plug was all white and there was a grayish brown color on it kinda light, i only did wot 4th gear for a few seconds maybe 4 seconds and tried toget into 5th
40:1
- Thread starter 89blaster89
- Start date
- Status
Good choice, play it safe and run what 90% of the rest of us run, or be conservative and go a little leaner with the fuel like Blaaster. Best thing to do is to plug chop to confirm...but you already know that.
Back it up with facts blaaster stop bashing people.Its up for him to descide I did not advise him to run 40:1.That fuel is going to run much hotter and much faster threw that motor with less oil.Im honestly really tired of you not explaining yourself and going strait to your an idiot.Ive run these to mixes all day on my ski.5 gallons burns a whole lot faster with less oil.Rpm is gain and throttle is a whole lot more responsive yes more oil is going to get a better seal creating more torque which will improve pulling a taller gear.These oils are more designed to lubricate at higher rpms than your basic wead eater motor.And yes im sure they have some aditives to help burn so you dont get no carbon build up.
I alway start with a jet I think is too big, I do not like running lean, even for the few seconds it takes to do a plug chop.
Detonation is a killer!
Detonation is a killer!
I think I will start a thread on vegetable gardening, cos there is enough fertiliser to sustain it here.
I think I will start a thread on vegetable gardening, cos there is enough fertiliser to sustain it here.
Real inteligent fact dashavoo.Nothing yet again to back up what you say.Bash and come up with proove me wrong for once.Make it an edjucational exprience thats what this is son.You seem to not have a life so have at it.Ive never seen so much disrespect in my life.
Real inteligent fact dashavoo.Nothing yet again to back up what you say.Bash and come up with proove me wrong for once.Make it an edjucational exprience thats what this is son.You seem to not have a life so have at it.Ive never seen so much disrespect in my life.
So its crap just because you say so huh.Got anything better than that.Have you proved me wrong on anything youve come to hurass me about.Im a grown man Im not a kid.Wish you were in my neighbor hood though Id shut you up pretty quick and teach you a little respect.Better to educate and back up your opinions with facts so people can make there own choices.Dont pick on people because you have nothing better to do and dont have a life.You brainiachs reminds me of armagedon take that guys drill bit and f it all up.I:I
That sounds like a physical threat to me, which is WAY against the pool rules. I'm thinking a moderator needs to pay attention to this. As for bringing proof, you gotta practice what you preach Rich, I haven't seen any data to back up your posts.
Am I correct here?
If higher octane fuel burns cooler than lower octane fuel, than less oil is required to lubricate the cylinder? So if someone mixes 32:1 on 81 octane pump gas, the temperature of that engine will be very very close to an engine that runs 40:1 on 93 pump gas, correct?
So both engines will run at around the same temperature, correct?
If higher octane fuel burns cooler than lower octane fuel, than less oil is required to lubricate the cylinder? So if someone mixes 32:1 on 81 octane pump gas, the temperature of that engine will be very very close to an engine that runs 40:1 on 93 pump gas, correct?
So both engines will run at around the same temperature, correct?
WTF ?????
both of you have been PM'd nicely by me to cut this sh*t out,
i've asked both of you to not respond directly to each others posts if we can't all play like good little kids, just post your opinion/answer and let the OP decipher what info to use, not try to downplay each others info
this is my last warning to both of you
infractions are next !!!!!!
I have ran both mixes and never noticed an increase in power. Just sayin.. you want more power try something else.
Rich i think your full of it..
Rich i think your full of it..
rich. ive been reading your post in multiple threads, and so far, u have been complety wrong about everything. and i really dont understand why you tell people the wrong things...... maybe because u have no clue what the hell your talking about, or maybe because u want other ppl to fry their motors cause ur angry at people. for wahtever the reason is, stop. its really freaking annoying, and im sick of seeing the forums clouded with all your crap that u post. and im sure im not the only one. also blaaster hasent bashed anyone. only you, cause u post such redicilious things and have no idea what the hell you are talking about 100% of the time. he has helped me a ton, and so far everything has worked and been running perfectly. and when you go back and edit your posts to the correct info that u just read from some people, that just makes you look like a complete douche. if you want to pos, fine, but do a little research first, then post what you find. not what u think is correct. ps: that little search bar up there, yea that works wonders...... i think u should try it out some time. who knows maybe you wont be posting crap any more, and more reliable answers.
Read the whole thing because there bashing on me because they dont agree with 40:1 I did not give that advice you are running that.Really a whole lot there to make much of any difference any way.Right.Yeah fuel is more cumbustible with less oil added to it engine will run leaner.Makes sence if you got more oil to lube the rings to hold more compression which in turns gives more torque or power right.Take this away you only get blow by.Not really a case as its so mineute.But still.I would rather someone come up with evidence rather than bashing some one.Ive never given any advice to mess someones bike up.
Last edited:
Thank you.Im not such an idiot after all.Yes may half to jet it maybe but you nailed it.I:I
Rich, I'm bumping this just for you buddy. You keep PMing me, saying you wanna kick my a55, saying I'm dumb and that nobody here thinks you don't give good advice...start at the beginning and read up. And I don't know why you think I'm Blaaster's sidekick, you PM'd me first trying to call me out and starting trouble. I told you to stop, but you didn't. This is the treatment you get from now on!
Who said you were dumb.What I posted is so mineute between the 2 mixes really dont make much of a difference but a franction of a second.Im just comming at it with a different perspective.I honestly want to get banned.Im tired of disrespecfull people.Its all personall no educated responces.Blaaster and you in another post tell me 25:1 will blow your motor but now he runs this.I just dont get it.Running 40:1 is lean.What happens when you run a lean setting.Its common sence.Fuel is going to burn faster and cleaner.Not sure the motor likes it much.Wont last.32:1 is more ideal its air cooled oil lubricates seals the rings to the cylander walls.More compression and lubrication so it lasts.I dont care how little as its little but fuel does burn up quicker Ive ran both ratios out on the lake and I go threw one tank faster than I do with the richer oil mix.More oil than this will cause carbon build up which is going to create its own set of problems unless your set up to run that.OIL IS A LUBRICANT AS A 2 STROKE GETS ITS LUBE FROM THE MIX IN THE GAS.There is a reason they dont mix this in a 4 stroke right.
- Status
