3 things you don't like about Blasters

[tjsdaname]

Name 3 things that you do not like about blasters. Then name 3 things you would change about them.

1. narrow wheelbase

2. square / wide seat

3. horrible shocks

things I would change.

1. 48 inch wheelbase stock

2. better shocks

3. and better ergo's...

 

[acezeesawtooth]

1. crappy tires

2. to hard of shocks for the light quad

3. ancient port layout

 

[4cfed]

change....

suspension

size

motor.... as in port work and water cooled

 

[bagds101]

absolutely nothing. thats what guys like ken oconnor and burgard are for. custom dont come in a box.

 

[1995blaster]

tires

wheel base

port work

 

['05Blaster]

1)width
2)length
3) ^^porting

 

[alex90]

steel wheels and 80's style balloon tires, suspension, wheel base, seat, gas tank shape, frame, rear swingarm and carrier design list goes on

 

[Paulie B]

Stock front bumper
The gap between the front and rear fenders is too small for taller 'kidz'
No water cooling or PV

 

[darederek]

too narrow but wide seat

no liquid cooled or pv w/ ancient port layout

crappy suspension

 

[sicivicdude]

I don't actually have three things.... because I've changed out most of the stuff I didn't like so it's no longer anything to complain about!

There is only one thing about a blaster I cannot change and do not like;

Seating position/legroom

 

[98blaster+4]

my list is things that come stock
1- why not give it a roundhouse style carrier, everything else has one
2-replaceable ball joints
3-rear hubs with a more universal pattern

 

[xKroniK13x]

1) Size
2) Bad reputation (Everyone thinks they're slow until I roost them)
3) Suspension

 

[sicivicdude]

my list is things that come stock
1- why not give it a roundhouse style carrier, everything else has one
2-replaceable ball joints
3-rear hubs with a more universal pattern

Ok, I can get down with those complaints about stock parts... my gripe is something you cannot change by buying new blaster parts...

 

[yzrider]

1. suspension
2. too small, i'm 6' 1 or 2, idk havn't measured, and i can't ride with front fenders, gonna make this thing a lot bigger this winter tho
3. stock power, come on, yamaha shoulda jus thrown the dt 200 engine in it, woulda been sooo much better

 

[Demo4o1]

1) lack of power for a 200cc 2s
2)TORS
3)suspension

though i changed my suspension adn removed my tors. and working on getting my motor to smash banshees and 400exs I:I

 

[Blaner]

If I was on the design team that still wanted a tamed motor for entry level sport riders:

wider foot pegs

wider stance

bigger carb

 

[chevymuddman]

1. size of the motor
2. better suspention
3. reputation

 

[hudack]

il list stuff i dont like that i havent fixed yet I:I
also its not realy that they made it under powered on accident
they did that for a reason I:I
better front shocks
better suspesion design
not long enough

 

[xKroniK13x]

1. suspension
2. too small, i'm 6' 1 or 2, idk havn't measured, and i can't ride with front fenders, gonna make this thing a lot bigger this winter tho
3. stock power, come on, yamaha shoulda jus thrown the dt 200 engine in it, woulda been sooo much better

I'm 6'3 and fit with fenders...

 

[JonS]

not water cooled, too narrow, don't like the built into plastics airbox..