Long rod just decreases the rod angle. Less stress and more efficent transfer of power from piston to crank. Doesn't change stroke. You'd need a spacer under the jug if you could find a compatable rod. Not worth the effort for an everyday motor. IMHO
agreed .............a longer rod wont make anymore power ,there will be slightly more dwell time and less angle for potential cylinder wear improvment but the extra mass thats thrown around will negate any power benefits and that mass can reduce the peak rpms of the little mill ....110mm stock is plenty long for that given stroke
yeah the +4 longrods arent bought, they are custom built, and apperently only endorsed by those builders who actually rebuild and repair crankshafts
it uses a 115mm banshee rod installed onto a +4 crank
as for the negating power qoute above, not all of us are looking for the most power at the trade off of "less cylinder wear" and reliability
most all modern 2 stroke engines are "square", meaning the bore closely matches the stroke, the stock blaster is far from this, the long rod helps get it closer to "square"
the rod isn't what brings it closer to square, it's the length of the stroke.
this is actually why older national MX motors used to use a smaller sleeve and longer stroke. to bring them closer to square while keeping it around the original 196cc
only long rod i care about is the one in my pants... hahaha I:I I:I but yeah what they say above is the truth of the matter
Ok,, The laughs on you because it does say +4, hate it for you!!!
yes !!!!!
i knew it had sumthin to do with stroke/square
maybe i'll amend the above statement
Where should I buy/get a +4 longrod for a blaster
I'm blowin my cash to go racing
the longer rod does help with the side loading on the cylinder, and should help with long-term durability/reliability as well.
you were on the right track, just not quite there yet!
So what should I use for trails and mx track