you contradicted yourself. when you put longer arms on the tie rid is longer yes, but the angle doesnt chance compared to the a arm. now when you put longer arms on, the mounts are in the same posistion, and so are the shock mounts, you just make the arm itself longer. it doesnt change geometry. now when you install this bastard dumbshit idea of a kit, it moves the mounts outward making the front wider. also making the front frame section wider. you get more stability yes, but it changes the frame geometry. it also does not figure in the tie rod, it stays in the stock location. it does not move the tie rod mount. it mounts in the factory location. now what that does is change the the angle the tie rod is compared to the a arm. you have now just changed the goemetry, and messed up the tie rod angle.....which is why this kit is unsafe to jump. not only that, bu tits just some thin steel holding your whole front suspension together. you wanna trust your life to some thin metal? i sure as hell dont. why do you think none of my bikes run wheel spacers or this bullshit pile of sh*t? cuz i dont trust either. in fact i would rather run stock suspension....you know why? cuz it works correctly, and is less likely to fail and kill me. it may need some upgrading yes, but works 1000x's better than this idea.
like i said b4, theres a reason you dont see these alot. if they were a great idea, then everybody would ditch the +2+1 arm/new shock idea, and run this.....why dont they? cuz it doenst compare. and its not nearly as affective or worth the hassle. not to mention not nearly as safe. its junk. face it, your wrong, this is junk.
if you make your case try not contradicting yourself. 1st you say tie rod angle doenst matter, then you say it does.....which is it. i know the answer.....IT DOES!
