Getting a quadracer

oops never heard of aaen i dont look hard for 85-86 i prefer the 85-86 rear swingys for the round housing but they crack so got to brace them up.. i forgot where i heard this phrase but "the 85-86 suzuki motor is an aborted peice of crap and they only used it for 2 years for a reason" end quote haha

Never heard that about the motor LOL. I like the 87-90 swinger I have one for my 86.

But everyone has thier opinion on each. I like the 85-86 and you the 87-on. Dont get me wrong I like all LTs myself.I:I
 
i like the 85-86 but i hate the motor.. what did you do with your stock 85-86 swingy?? i may want it.. i like it just becaus its really nice to adjust iv always had problems with the 87- quadracer and quadsport
 
i like the 85-86 but i hate the motor.. what did you do with your stock 85-86 swingy?? i may want it.. i like it just becaus its really nice to adjust iv always had problems with the 87- quadracer and quadsport

Ive heard the are hard to adjust but I think they are just stronger over all. Mine was shot cracked almost all the way aross on the one carrier mount.

Hers a pic
photoMA25857534-0009-1.jpg
 
holy sh*t man that is a bad one iv seen worse its useable though.. they are a pain to adjust i got sick of working on my friends quadsport constantly i told him to sell it or get a new round carrier (he chose to sell it).. the blaster swingarm is even better than the 87 up swingy
 
I had a friend that sold me the 87 swinger complete with all the suspension, axle, hubs and all basicly readt too bolt up for 50 bucks. I want to get a aftermarket swinger eventually. But I got use what I got for now LOL.

I saw a guy on QuadracerHQ making nice ones for a decent price.
 
ya as long as you can ride..ya saw his to its the same price as a metal tech i belive??? i want a metaltech one end of the mx season im buying one for myself as a present for my 1st year of racing quads haha..
 
Take an 86
throw a Burgards swinger with a twin row elliptical carrier
revalve the stock rear shock, even though there is no rebound, they are ok
get the upper shock mount relocation kit from HSD
Aftermarket shocks same length as YFZ450 shocks
Burgards +3 +1 A-Arms

The motor is a different story........it is a very reliable engine.....but limited due to the overall intake size cause the reeds are under the cylinder. With a mild port, decked head, and a fresh rebuild, it will hang with a stock 450. Cant go much further though............ there is a reason they redesigned the entire top end for 87.

It is a bit of a challenge to get parts for an 85-86......but they are out there.
If you spend some time talking to the guys at HSD or Burgards they can get you what you need.

Best part about an 85-86..........it is super super super light!!!!!!!!!!
I would love to buy and build another!!!!!!!
 
my opion on the rear shock is to get rid of it.. its not a horrible shock but im running a raptor 700 shock and its like it was built for it.. with pre-load, rebound, compression adjustment makes it a bit better in my mind
 
Take an 86
throw a Burgards swinger with a twin row elliptical carrier
revalve the stock rear shock, even though there is no rebound, they are ok
get the upper shock mount relocation kit from HSD
Aftermarket shocks same length as YFZ450 shocks
Burgards +3 +1 A-Arms

The motor is a different story........it is a very reliable engine.....but limited due to the overall intake size cause the reeds are under the cylinder. With a mild port, decked head, and a fresh rebuild, it will hang with a stock 450. Cant go much further though............ there is a reason they redesigned the entire top end for 87.

It is a bit of a challenge to get parts for an 85-86......but they are out there.
If you spend some time talking to the guys at HSD or Burgards they can get you what you need.

Best part about an 85-86..........it is super super super light!!!!!!!!!!
I would love to buy and build another!!!!!!!

You can always put a long rod kit in it, using a 87 rod in the 86 crank.
 
my opion on the rear shock is to get rid of it.. its not a horrible shock but im running a raptor 700 shock and its like it was built for it.. with pre-load, rebound, compression adjustment makes it a bit better in my mind

No doubt. Im jus sayin it isnt that bad. I love the whole cushion lever, upside down linkage thing the old racers had going. Lots of fun.
 
no not at all the rear shocks on the old quadracers were great for their time the whole shock setup was not a bad setup.. some rear rappy shocks and yfz450 fronts make them handel like a dream.. cushion lever?? the full floater setup?? im not against it im not for it, reason for dis like is all the bearings you have to replace, i like it because the full floater system works well it was used the rm 125's and 250's so they did something right
 
no not at all the rear shocks on the old quadracers were great for their time the whole shock setup was not a bad setup.. some rear rappy shocks and yfz450 fronts make them handel like a dream.. cushion lever?? the full floater setup?? im not against it im not for it, reason for dis like is all the bearings you have to replace, i like it because the full floater system works well it was used the rm 125's and 250's so they did something right

I think the 91-92 rear suspension set up was the best version. I think like you said to much involved with the whole set up.
 
im going by what the old dirtwheels test said about all 3 of the 250s made in 88.. the results were surprising to me. ill just sum it up the trx has better suspension, the lt had good enough suspension to keep up but the motor made more power and was able to get out of the whole faster and corners faster than the trx, the tecate they said had horrible suspension and the motor had more power overall over the other 2 to get the holeshot and out of the corners.. and i agree with them on it.. they did like 3 tests and did a woods,mx,cross country in one race for like 10 laps.. i will say dont buy a tecate not many parts.. i would buy the lt cheaper and has the motor and potential in the suspension department to keep up with the trx
 
no not at all the rear shocks on the old quadracers were great for their time the whole shock setup was not a bad setup.. some rear rappy shocks and yfz450 fronts make them handel like a dream.. cushion lever?? the full floater setup?? im not against it im not for it, reason for dis like is all the bearings you have to replace, i like it because the full floater system works well it was used the rm 125's and 250's so they did something right

Yeah, the cushion lever is the pivot that sits right inbetween the shock and the connecting link. Its even cool how the shock faces the other way. The full floater is cause they seperated the brake caliper from the rear carrier. It helps stop the rear suspension from extending when smashing the rear brakes. All stolen from the bikes.
 
In the world of performance ATVs, 250 two-stroke four-wheelers are the weapon of choice. Like their motorcycle cousins, 250 are capable of turning much faster lap times than their brothers. Whether it’s lap times or blazing the trails, the performance-oriented four-wheelers are the sport cars of off-road vehicles.

MORE CHOICES THAN EVER
This year the competition and performance-minded rider has the best and most numerous choices ahs has ever had. Last year, Suzuki’s original LT250 Quadracer, the first race-designed four-wheeler and the ATV screen, was challenged by Honda’s fantastic FourTrax 250R. For ’87 the Honda has undergone refinements to further improve what was already an excellent vehicle. Now Kawasaki has launched the all-new KXF250 Tecate-4 on a collision course with the new ’87 LT250RH Quadracer and Honda’s ’87 250R FourTrax.



Since we’ve had a chance to test each of these machines separately, we’ve decided to compare them head to head in what has turned out to be the closest shootout in Dirt Wheels

history. Never have three bikes been so evenly matched. Picking a single winner out of the bunch seemed impossible at first. All three were extremely capable, and all were winners. Picking one over another became a matter of subtle personal preferences. A lot of it had to do with personal idiosyncrasies. Maybe one rider preferred a certain dealer-ship. For another parts availability and reliability were the most important attributes. The subtle nuances that made one of these bikes a better choice for one rider could just as easily be countered by the individual strengths of another.



WHAT TO DO?

After riding all three machines on a variety of tracks and trails, the result were less than conclusive. So we decided to do something a little bit different for this shootout. WE decided to make a special Dirt Wheels test course that would encompass every sort of terrain obstacle and riding environment we could possibly imagine. Thus was born the Dirt Wheels 250 shootout test loop. After extensive searching, we came up with a five-mile loop that had everything but the kitchen sink in it.



TESTING ONE, TWO, THREE….

The next step was to prep all three machines for a no-holds-barred test encounter. Nuts and bolts were checked, chains lubed and shocks checked and adjusted, air filters serviced and tire pressures checked. Our test would consist of several three-lap circuits around the course.

We would use three intermediate level riders on the machines and three pro-level racers. They would ride alternately on the five-mile loops. Our goal was a total of 20 torturous miles or eight laps on three of the best ATVs made today.

To give you a more accurate feel for how the vehicles performed in the actual test, we will really what it was like to ride a typical lap around our 250 shootout course.



LINE ‘EM UP AND MOVE ‘EM OUT

Assembling at the starting line, our three contestants (after topping the gas tanks, thoroughly warming up the machines and then killing the motors) waited mervously to start the five mile Dirt Wheels torture test. Lighting up on the first kick, the Suzuki LT250RH Quadracer jetrted out to an immediate holeshot, followed closely by the Tecate-4, which also fired up, on the first kick. The Honda FourTrax pilot wicked it up the catch the first two after requiring three kicks to roar to like.

The first section of the course consisted of tight, twisty woods trails. In the fast woods section the Kawasaki, with its horter wheelbase and narrower front end, soon gained ground on the holeshotting Suzuki. Tucking inside on a tight woods hairpin turn, the Kawasaki pilot pumped the clutch and blasted past the Suzuki Quadracer. Making up for lost time, the Honda FourTrax pilot and narrowed the gap between himself and the leaders.



OVER HILL AND DALE



As our readers headed out of the woods section, the Tecate-4 led, with the Quadracer and FourTrax hot on it heels. Approaching a moderately steep downhill, all three machines waited till the last possible moment to brake. The Honda pilot out braked the Suzuki and Kawasaki riders and slipped into the lead going down the hill. The Kawasaki and Suzuki followed closely. The Honda, Kawie and Suzuki pilots all downshifted once. They made a turn and proceeded back down a series of rain ruts, which caused everyone to suddenly jam on the brakes. Both the Suzuki and the Kawie riders momentarily stalled their motors, but quick reactions got the wheels spinning again and both were hot on the trail of the leading Four-Trax. A gnarly hill climb lay dead ahead. All; three machines made it up the hill with no problems, but the Tecate-4 had to downshift once and fan the clutch at the very top.



JEEPING ALONG



The next section of trail was a fast, deeply rutted jeep trail. With a slight lead, the Honda blasted into this section in hopes of picking up some time over its rivals. The Suzuki and Kawasaki were neck and neck down the fast, rutted fire road. The Suzuki started to pull away from the Kawie as the trail became increasingly more rutted and rough. The Suzuki’s longer travel suspension was in its element now and aided by the hard-hitting mid-range punch and blinding top-end acceleration, was gaining ground fast on the Honda Four-Trax.



SWAMP THING



As the three ATV’s approached the dreaded mud bog lime pits, the Honda pilot nailed the throttle and hit the mud bog, lofting the front end with the torquey FourTrax motor. Right behind him, the Suzuki pilot nailed the throttle and lofted the front end of a shorter distance and then buried it in the two-foot deep slime. Only a steady, concerted dose of throttle kept him from flying over the bars. The Tecate-4 rider saw the Suzuki’s predicament, braked hare, hit the throttle and sailed past the Quad rider.

As the three machines wheelied out of the mud bog, a two-to-three-foot-deep water crossing loomed ahead. Not missing a stroke, the Honda pilot again wheelied his mount, gently touching the front end in midstream. The Kawasaki pilot hit the throttle then spun the wheels on the slick bank and plowed a wake into the water crossing. In spite of a wall of water crashing over the bike, it didn’t miss a beat. But as the rider emerged on the the opposite bank, a tap on the rear brakes indicated their stopping power had disappeared somewhere back in the stream. As the bikes wheeled back past the momentarily brakeless Kawasaki and set off after the fast disappearing
Honda.



MR. SANDMAN



Approaching a series of sand worm turns followed by two sets of sand whoops, the harder-hitting Suzuki began to catch the front-running Honda. After the first couple of worm turns, the Kawie pilot’s brakes had dried out, and he was also in hot pursuit. As the Honda entered the first sand-whoop section, the Suzuki managed to pull almost even with him. Both machines took the oddly spaced-whoops at full tilt, side by side. As they headed into the second set of whoops, the Suzuki Quadracer started to inch ahead. The higher the speed, the better the Quad’s suspension fells. At speed, the Honda has just a hint of rear end swamp. The Kawie, meanwhile, was doubling whoops in a desperate attempt to catch up.



ROCK AND ROLL



Once out of the sand, a gnarly rock-filled trail lay ahead. Having taken the lead in the sand, the Quad hit the rock trail at a fast gallop. With 4.9 inches of ground clearance, the Suzuki pilot was able to straddle most boulders on the trail. Since skid-pan protection on the Suzuki is minimal, the rider still had to be careful which rocks he aimed at. The Honda pilot, having a reduced ground clearance of only 4.3 inches, had to be more careful how big a boulder he attempted to straddle. Although the Honda did have the best skidpan protection of the three machines, it also had the lowest ground clearance.

As they continued up the rock-infested trail, the Tecate-4 started gaining ground in the tight twisties, where the ability to maneuver quickly comes to play. Although it also had minimal skid-plate protection, the Tecate-4 did have the most ground clearance of the bunch- five inches.



FIRE-ROAD HEAVEN



Coming out of the rocky trail in the lead, the Suzuki hit the high-peed, hard-pack fire-road section pouring on the throttle. Zigzagging’ past the Honda in the rocks, the Kawie emerged second and lit up the tires in a bid to reel in the Suzuki. Mere seconds behind the Kawie, the Honda lazily rolled onto the fire road, catching gears in a caching-gun patter until it was in sixth gear. The only problem was, every time he shifted into sixth, he’d have to shift right back down into fifth to maintain a good drive. Sixth on the Honda is more like an overdrive than an actual working gear.

Meanwhile, in the lead, the Suzuki was continuing to hold off the Kawie. The Suzuki seemed to be the only bike of the three capable of pulling strongly in sixth gear. The Tecate-4’s speed in sixth as very similar to the Honda’s, and it, too is more like an over-drive gear.

After easily negotiating a rut-filled corner at high speed (very precisely), the Suzuki headed into the home stretch. Only a set of double jumps, some dirt whoops and a loamy dirt corner separated it from the finish. Hot on the Suzuki’s heels was the nimble-handling but more skittish at higher speeds Kawasaki Tecate-4. The Honda Four-Tax wasn’t far off the pace, and as the narrower and shorter Tecate-4 two-wheeled while coming out of the rut filled corner, the Honda broad slid past it on the outside.



DOUBLE YOUR PLEASURE



Coming up to the double-jump section, the Suzuki pilot pegged the motor and set sail. Carving a smooth, graceful arch, it touched down, easily clearing the dreaded doubles. The FourTrax pilot gunned the motor, kept the power on and barely cleared the edge ot the second jump. Immediately behind him, the Kawie hit the jump wide open, also barely clearing the double. Another quick, straight-on jump, and all three machines were catching gears and winding out, straining to cross the finish line first.



WHOOPDEDO



Slamming into a series of hard-dirt whoops, the Suzuki skimmed the tops on its way to only one more turn and the finish line of the five-mile loop. The Kawasaki had pulled even with the FourTrax pilot in the dirt whoops, and both riders flew across the whoops, side by side. Neither backed off an inch as they approached the next-to-last hard-pack turn. AS the Suzuki approached the finally loamy turn before the finish, the Honda and Kawasaki entered the hark-pack turn side by side. The Honda pilot immediately did a quick spin-out, doughnut turn. The Tecate-4 squared off the inside line and headed for the last corner.



SAVING THE BEST FOR LAST



Executing a perfect broad slide into the loose-loam turn, the Quad pilot nailed the throttle to loft a perfect photo-finish wheelie across the finish line. Hot on his heels, the Tecate-4 exploded out of the power berm to take second, while the Honda recovering from the spin-out take third.



WHEW…



Now, that is what one alp was like. In the following lap the results were reversed, with the Honda taking the win, the Suzuki finishing second and the Tecate-4 third. On the next lap the Kawie emerged on the top with the Honda second and the Suzuki third

Which 250 is best? It depends. The differences are so minute that, as we said earlier, on one of the three can and will win. Check out how the machines worked in the type of terrain you ride most often, and make your choice. With these three ATV’s there are no wrong decisions-only different circumstances.

this is not the artical i was talking about but it gets the point across that they are really close
 
85-86 for sure.. with out the correct plastics it throws it off and throws the value down... iv seen decent condition 85-86s go for 1200-1500 here... but i can tell by that pipe its a 85-86 they swing right then back to the left instead of left and up..

offer $450.. if he dont take it hes stupid..