keep in mind that when you raise the cylinder, it'll affect your transfer timing.
also, if you're running a mid/top end pipe, why not port the cylinder to match the pipe? mismatching porting w/ the pipe is a debilitating error.
but great thread man. and def looking forward to the vids!
thanks your right on what you said, yes i did have that in mind, thats why i didnt raise the transfers any, the pipe is a mid to top pipe, and since the whole jug was raised 1.1mm over stock, that increased the timing quite enough, exhaust was raised .5mm max, and i feel it has enough mid to top, i think the porting is matching pretty good, infact it needs a tad more low end, and im hoping to get that when the head is reshaped eventually and cut for a squish of 1mm or so. right now the squish is close to what a stock blaster has, so there is more room to gain a bit of power still. it does wheely easily in 4th gear without tugging on the handle bars with a +2 in swing arm once in the powerband, and a very noticable power band lol, it hits hard, there is no inbetween its either on or off, and im 100% positive thats how this pipe works, i guarentee if i put on a stock pipe, it would have mostly low end and no top, the pipe is number 1 in determing where you power comes in, the porting i did benefits the mid to top mostly but if user wants more low end, its as simple as switching the pipe.
now there is a point in where the porting can have a bigger effect then the pipe i think, and taht would be a drag port, and i mean 100% drag with no low end and mild mid, and all top end, then switching to a low end pipe wont benefit. when i had the shearer pipe it was a low end monster, power started right off of idle, and fell quite short up top. overall a decent pipe, not so with this pipe, its got a soft low end that builds into the midrange, im tempted to see what a right bend pipe would do like a power pro, or dyno port, but i dont got that money to blow for a new pipe.