myths prepetuated by more myth's?
Momma always asked you that if your buddies jumped off a bridge, would you jump too? Most people answer no to the first question but will still buy LT setups simply because they believe someone's recommendation that something is better. Everyone sees that YFZ's are "race ready" from the factory so they want YFZ shocks on their bikes. Companies make arms to fit YFZ shocks on other bikes and because the YFZ shock is 15 3/4" (longer by 1" than the 14 3/4" banshee/blaster/warrior shock) they call them LT. The myth perpetuates.
I'm not claiming to know more than anyone else about suspension. I just don't have any preconceived notions about the way suspension "is supposed" to work... If you have 14" of travel out of your suspension components (and I mean the joints and tie rod ends) you could control that completely with the properly sprung/valved shock with only 2" of travel. Completely possible. Hell in the effort to save space, some european vehicles don't even use linear shock absorbers! They use a fluid gearbox (akin to a door closer) to put resistance on the suspension travel, look up rotary dashpot.
Oh, and I'm not saying long travel is junk... I'm saying that the desire to have rebuildable shocks on a bike that came without them is understandable. (I too would like to have YFZ shocks simply so I could pull them apart each spring and freshen them up). Companies who make arms to fit factory shocks call them standard and then the arms that are made to fit the longer (and rebuildable) shocks are called long travel. They had to name them something. What I am saying is that using the (possibly) wrong shock combo for your riding style simply because they are 18" long is foolish. You're better off using a properly sprung and valved standard travel combo will net better results. If the 18" shocks are the correct spring and valving ratio they will stay cooler in extreme use than the standard travel shocks but that's not enough of an advantage to use them IF they are the wrong combo.
Momma always asked you that if your buddies jumped off a bridge, would you jump too? Most people answer no to the first question but will still buy LT setups simply because they believe someone's recommendation that something is better. Everyone sees that YFZ's are "race ready" from the factory so they want YFZ shocks on their bikes. Companies make arms to fit YFZ shocks on other bikes and because the YFZ shock is 15 3/4" (longer by 1" than the 14 3/4" banshee/blaster/warrior shock) they call them LT. The myth perpetuates.
I'm not claiming to know more than anyone else about suspension. I just don't have any preconceived notions about the way suspension "is supposed" to work... If you have 14" of travel out of your suspension components (and I mean the joints and tie rod ends) you could control that completely with the properly sprung/valved shock with only 2" of travel. Completely possible. Hell in the effort to save space, some european vehicles don't even use linear shock absorbers! They use a fluid gearbox (akin to a door closer) to put resistance on the suspension travel, look up rotary dashpot.
Oh, and I'm not saying long travel is junk... I'm saying that the desire to have rebuildable shocks on a bike that came without them is understandable. (I too would like to have YFZ shocks simply so I could pull them apart each spring and freshen them up). Companies who make arms to fit factory shocks call them standard and then the arms that are made to fit the longer (and rebuildable) shocks are called long travel. They had to name them something. What I am saying is that using the (possibly) wrong shock combo for your riding style simply because they are 18" long is foolish. You're better off using a properly sprung and valved standard travel combo will net better results. If the 18" shocks are the correct spring and valving ratio they will stay cooler in extreme use than the standard travel shocks but that's not enough of an advantage to use them IF they are the wrong combo.