spacer plate vs. milling head and other ?'s
- Thread starter desgre90
- Start date
I will say that the +3 crank setup is alot easier then going +4. You dont have to have the cases trenched like you do for the plus 4. You can even just throw it together with the spacer that comes with it, but like everyone has mentioned here, your port timing will be off that way. Best thing to do right now desgre90 would be to call up a builder and have them build a monster for ya...
Sorry man, his piston is negative deck(piston out past the deck)
I will not explain how I choose to build my set up
I feel engine builders spend many hours getting the set ups right
...does that mean his jug was decked or "milled" on the base gasket side or the head side??......sorry just trying to make sense of this
i guess its whatever then...........seems to me like alot of uneeded heat build up from missing material in the head...............imo!
well I guess it doesn't matter anymore. I sent the cases with my friend to get checked out. The chuck missing out of the side case is not repairable... and on top of that the ported jug I bought is trash as well. I had some money set aside for this, but not anywhere near what this is turning into. fml
long rod? its the same length rod on stock,+3,+4. spacer plates work and are cost effective but to get the most out of a stroker motor, porting and head machining are needed. further more you have to account for gasket thickness head and base gasket, and squish clearence ,so its not 3 or 4 mm into the head... it could be as little a .100
i have my head mill all the way flat with a +3 stroker and i put it together without the spacer plate and started it up and it was hitting the head.i then put the spacer plate in and it was perfect.if you mill the head use the spacer plate
