most bad ass quad of all time
- Thread starter jlg8281
- Start date
Im with the 250r as well. Im surprised the Banshee is gettin more love (actually I guess not, this IS a yamaha site after all 
)
)Bad ass quad yes but it falls way short IMO.
I mean it goes through mud but what else can it do?
exactly, that why there cant be a "best quad of all time" cuz they all have different uses. Someone who likes mud will say the can am outlander is the best cuz an ltr450r or trx250r wont go through it as efficiently.
While the outlander cant jump or do mx sh*t, those two other can. Its all bout personal preference.
Me, i prefer a xc built 250r or yfz450x
LT 250/500 hybrid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FTW
Preffer a 85-86 250 frame with modified front shock mount.......
Preffer a 85-86 250 frame with modified front shock mount.......
then join honda forum they suck my blaster could eat one alive but not right now it needs new tires i will get pics some time
Youre funny. Theres only a couple of guys on here who could make that bold of a claim.
And remember theres more to quads than straight line speed.
Theres also a reason why they were banned from racing. The 250r is known as the best sports quad ever made by many people.
I seriously doubt you could hang with one on a motocross track. Blasters are just plain outclassed generally by the 250r.
If you have a ported 3mill 240 you could hang with a mildly ported 250r. But then again thats in a straight line...
One thing to consider about the 250r is that Suzuki had Laeger frames made to 250r geometry with the LT motor in them to run with the 250r......
I know man, just sayin. You know what I mean. The Honda is literally in a class quite a ways above a blaster. Theres a reason why they are 3500-5000 dollars for one if you can even find one. Theyre great quads for people like us. People who ride the way we do.
I hear you when I bought my LT I was looking for a 250r but I was not willing to give up my first born for one............
I agree that the 250r is the best quad ever made and I feel that every company is still trying to get it right like Honda did back in the late 80s..
Oh, I have no doubt theres plenty of blasters on this site that will beat a 250r in a straight line.
Hell, theres even a couple that have both speed and suspension that can do a decent job on one.
But the 250r is almost 50 inches wide. Its so damn stable and handles so well. It has the suspension geometery to handle the width. A stock blaster is like 39 inches wide. That thing is damn near a foot wider not to mention longer. It isnt a whole lot heavier either. And it is watercooled.
Im not a nut swinger, but if money wasnt an issue, Id take a 250r over a blaster any day of the week. Theres like 3 nice ones for sale right now by me.
I just cant justify 3k+ for a damn quad.
Hell, theres even a couple that have both speed and suspension that can do a decent job on one.
But the 250r is almost 50 inches wide. Its so damn stable and handles so well. It has the suspension geometery to handle the width. A stock blaster is like 39 inches wide. That thing is damn near a foot wider not to mention longer. It isnt a whole lot heavier either. And it is watercooled.
Im not a nut swinger, but if money wasnt an issue, Id take a 250r over a blaster any day of the week. Theres like 3 nice ones for sale right now by me.
I just cant justify 3k+ for a damn quad.
no i think that the quadzilla is the most bad ass, i mean come on it goes 97 stock what other quad can do that lol
Quadzilla is pretty pimp. Its like the.... 9 second muscle car of the quad world.
It just doesnt really seem to be the most reliable, and doesnt handle the best either. Thats why I didnt pick it.
It just doesnt really seem to be the most reliable, and doesnt handle the best either. Thats why I didnt pick it.
