Burgard +2+1 arms and Banshee spindles
- Thread starter jesshamner
- Start date
If you want to find out for sure that the a-arms are the right ones and not a+3+1 bottom etc then give me a measurement and I will compare them to mine and get a measurement for you.I run the +2+1 also.I am leaning towards a bent spindle but who knows.
my asr arms had the same exact problem as i also used shee spindles except my arms use hein joints instead of ball joints for me to ge a zero reading i had to have the heims screwed to far out . ideally u want 3/4 of the threaded area on a heim joint or threaded ball joint for that matter screwed into the arm. mine were only in a lil less than 1/2 the threaded area so i had asr make me a new set of upper arms that were 1/2 inch longer
i see nothing wrong with that chamber, ideally you want 2-3 degrees of positive chamber (thats what ive always ran)
the more zero the chamber the more the tires want to roll and even make the quad tippy
the more zero the chamber the more the tires want to roll and even make the quad tippy
The picture doesn't really show it well. You're right 3 degrees is what most people run and the target camber I have been after. Its definitely too much negative camber right now.
So I took a look at the set up again this weekend but I couldn't find a carpenter's level to get the degrees of camber. Its definitely too much camber. I have adjusted the upper balljoints out as far as possible without the nut falling off. Its only threaded halfway through the nut and the camber is still negative. Its ok to ride but I just don't like having that much camber. I guess I'll use the other set of banshee spindles and have them set up for the blaster and burgard a arms.
