front works tripple rates lt

[DUALSTROKE]

Front set of works tripple rate shocks in great working shape ready to bolt on and go.These shocks are 16.25 inches long and come from a yfz.I was going to use these on my long travel setup but went another route.
$250 shipped


http://i52.tinypic.com/1ew8rs.jpg

http://i56.tinypic.com/21abtc6.jpg

http://i55.tinypic.com/3483ho3.jpg

http://i53.tinypic.com/14447d2.jpg

 

[Awk08]

seeing these again almost brings a tear, these were on my sons bike for a full season and rode like a dream, except i was using them on stock arms, which had the ball joints bound
so i had planned on getting the CFM lowering blocks for his or using these with my long travel arms i got from 442, except they werent LT either when they arrived ??
so i ended up trading these to dually for stock travel, dual rate, remote rezzie elka's

someone needs to snatch these up for an LT set-up, or get the CFM lowering blocks for stock a-arms

i've had 2 different sets of works dual rate blaster shocks,
these felt much, much, better than either set of them !!!!!!!!!!!!

you won't find a better long travel shock without spending $500+ !!!!!!!!!

 

[2smoker85]

yeah i would def snatch these up but i got standard travel arms, wish i would have gone long travel now!! sh!t!!

 

[88' blaster]

what do you have to do to make them long travel

 

[Awk08]

move the bottom mount out to 7+ inches instead of the stock 4+ inches, which requires an LT a-arm, or the lowering blocks from CFM
like these ones right below the cfm airbox, these are the only lowering blocks guarenteed for jumping.............

blasterpropg

 

[Luni]

AWK, question:

If the lowering blocks lower the front end of the quad, is it picked back up by the increase in the length of the front shock you run since the new one will be "long travel"?

What Im getting at is, if I used the CFM lowering blocks, to run some long travel shocks (like say the YFZ450 shocks), would I still be a stockish ride height or would I be lower? I dont want to be lower. Id actually like to be a LITTLE higher.

 

[Awk08]

i believe, from my recent follies with the supposed long travel a-arms i got from 442,
(they are not long travels) that even with the cfm lowering blocks that with these shocks, it is still gonna sit slightly higher than stock heigth

when i had these shocks on the asr+3's the front sat at 12 inches to bottom of frame, when i put the elka's on it put me at 10 inches, same height i had my
T-ROCK rear swinger made for

 

[DUALSTROKE]

Payment pending!!!! Thanks for all interested.

 

[mmajay]

AWK, question:

If the lowering blocks lower the front end of the quad, is it picked back up by the increase in the length of the front shock you run since the new one will be "long travel"?

What Im getting at is, if I used the CFM lowering blocks, to run some long travel shocks (like say the YFZ450 shocks), would I still be a stockish ride height or would I be lower? I dont want to be lower. Id actually like to be a LITTLE higher.

CFM lowering blocks will not work for long travel shocks on a blaster. I bought the blocks and there was clearance issues. You must move mounts or have the long travel setup to use these shocks. I still have the blocks that are pretty much a useless piece of scrap metal.

 

[Luni]

CFM lowering blocks will not work for long travel shocks on a blaster. I bought the blocks and there was clearance issues. You must move mounts or have the long travel setup to use these shocks. I still have the blocks that are pretty much a useless piece of scrap metal.

Thank you for that clarification. I appreciate that.

So, off topic then, but why would someone want to LOWER their blaster? What good are the CFM blocks then?

 

[yzrider]

Thank you for that clarification. I appreciate that.

So, off topic then, but why would someone want to LOWER their blaster? What good are the CFM blocks then?

back to topic after this, they'd wanna lower it to lower the center of gravity for flat track racing, it stays flat around corners much better